Enrollments closing soon for Post Graduate Certificate Program in Applied Data Science & AI By IIT Roorkee | 3 Seats Left
Apply NowYou can use sklearn's cross_val_score() like-
cross_val_score(estimator, predictors_data, target_variable, scoring = None, cv = None)
where
estimator is our ML model,
scoring is the evaluation metric that we specify (Refer to metrics for seeing a list of available metrics in sklearn for the scoring parameter) and
cv is the value of k in the k-fold.
We use neg_root_mean_squared_error as the scoring metric for our task. It is negative RMSE. Sklearn's cross-validation features uses a utility function instead of a cost function. In the cost function, the cost will be lower for a better model while in a utility function, it should be greater for a better model.
And because of this convention of sklearn to use a utility function while cross validating, we use the scoring function as negative RMSE. It is the opposite of the RMSE. So, negative RMSE is just a negative version of the numbers which we get in RMSE. So, if for one data point, RMSE comes as 3 then negative RMSE will be -3 for that.
Refer to cross_val_score documentation for further details about the method.
Import function cross_val_score from sklearn.model_selection.
Use the cross_val_score function and provide tree_reg as estimator, housing_prepared and housing_labels as predictors_data and target_variable, neg_root_mean_squared_error as the scoring metric and cv as 10 for parameters as we want to perform 10-fold cross-validation. Store the output in a variable named scores.
The scores will be negative. Pass them through abs() function to convert them in positives by-
scores = abs(scores)
Note- Scores will be different on different runs due to the stochastic nature of the function.
Taking you to the next exercise in seconds...
Want to create exercises like this yourself? Click here.
Note - Having trouble with the assessment engine? Follow the steps listed here
Loading comments...